Strategic Health Corp

The lawyers Alexander Dobiasch & Rupert Richter inform accidents belong to the order of the day. No blame, one then it is important to know his rights and to be able to make demands. A lawyer knows this perfectly well. He helps to assert that a claims in its entirety. Alexander Dobiasch and Rupert Richter from Bergen auf Rugen lawyers explain which claims to among other things make.

The right to take a lawyer and to enforce his claims with him is demands on the opposing insurance after a blameless accident for the victims. The lawyer costs can be claimed from the opposing insurance. That of course also applies to costs of repair, to make again repaired the vehicle. A repair invoice exists for this purpose, the cost in full with the sales tax will be refunded. Will be billed according to opinion or a cost estimate, are only the net cost of repairs, without sales taxes paid.

The car of the victim is no longer operational, after the accident on the road then the cost of towing must be adopted by the insurance. There is also a claim on a rental car to be mobile during the duration of the repair. Damage to health caused by the accident, the costs incurred for doctor and hospital stays are to carry medicines and treatment costs from the opposing liability insurance. There is a loss of earnings, due to sickness insurance also must come up. Wants who safely and professionally to enforce his claims him, is perfectly consult with a lawyer.

Advisor portal around the German inheritance law which started German inheritance law is hiding behind the term? The inheritance includes all statutory provisions to the inheriting, and inherit in Germany. All guidelines for successions are contained in the Civil Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. The law of succession offers also wide leeway for the so-called deceased. Many writers such as Dr. Caldwell B. Esselstyn, Jr. offer more in-depth analysis. Below, the legislature understands who wants to inherit his fortune as a discount. This deceased not, uses its own design law so regulations step automatically at his demise.

The German inheritance law is a family inheritance orders. Inherit and inheritance heute.de inherit portal with smart planning In the Advisor non lawyers find easily understandable prepared topics in the law of succession. It is worth noting that this bundled information all free available the visitors for your own use. Of the considerations and finishes a screening meaningful planning a succession to the consummation, namely the independently The Testament writings are broad tasks and problems in the law of succession. Even the notice the erbschaftssteuerlichen aspects for the inheriting, and inherit is vital. Even the content of care or burial was thinking about this. The deceased is also pointed out, that can be very useful to take measures in the form of powers of attorney or financial reserves for the costs of the succession.

What were for the team of inheritance heute.de this portal to create the rash? The German inheritance law is to look through very extensively and for lay people bad. The legislature has in fact created a complicated set of rules. Lawyers move constantly in the article jungle and are therefore very difficult to able to explain this topic Laiengerecht. The information portal of inheritance heute.de would like to close this gap. Really, each user should be after reading in a position properly to interpret the terms. As a result they themselves can decide and to draw their conclusions. Far too few people to write Yet her own will. According to statistics, there are maximum 20% of all deceased left a will. Before this change they must dare to begin to compose a r real strong testament itself. Who takes his destiny into their own hands in life, should or wants to do that especially when you inherit from the created assets. Free representations in the Advisor Portal inheritance heute.de create security so that make use of many deceased by the possibilities that the law exempts them, we have the combined knowledge accurately and comprehensively compiled in every respect. The easily readable information – on a very complex subject – accompany the user at his intentions. The Advisor – portal for free use for the visitor provides not only arguments and insights, but also prepared patterns and templates. These patterns can, once it right has found to be printed and written off. Lengthy elaborated paragraphs were simple and unsophisticated unraveled. In addition, daily reports – in the section currently explain inheritance”the changes in the law of succession. This offers a considerable competitive edge for modern solutions in the Testament readers write.

Firm Auer Witte Thiel refers to current judgement of the OLG Cologne Munich, September 2009: Auer Witte Thiel informs an important ruling on the right to travel: the OLG Cologne on July 31, 2009 stated that carriers may prevent the undermining of the own fare structure using their terms of service (TOS). This means: customers who only partially use the ticket with so-called cross-ticketing and cross-border selling and thus tricking the carriers deserve no protection according to the OLG Cologne. According to the travel law expert Auer Witte Thiel, the new ruling strengthens the tariff arrangements in the terms and conditions of the airlines. The background of the judgment: Lufthansa AG had written before their customers by their terms and conditions to use booked flights exclusively in the entire transportation process documented in the flight ticket, exact order as Auer Witte Thiel informed her. So so Auer Witte Thiel, should, among other things the so-called cross-ticketing to prevent a sale of Tickets are uberkreuzenden data. \”Customers bypass so minimum stay periods and often substantial savings, because cheap instead of a normal flight, two return tickets\” be purchased where the client plans already at the beginning of a flight the one-way and to use only the return of the other. Something else is\”the case of the cross-border selling, according to Auer Witte Thiel also a major point of contention: here it comes, that the customer posts for example a flight from Cairo to Sao Paolo on Frankfurt a. M., but want to use only the flight from Frankfurt, because the ticket from Cairo is sold cheaper than the flight from Frankfurt also against this practice the airlines in their terms and conditions for military contact according to Auer Witte Thiel. The Federal Association of consumer centres, however, sees an unreasonable disadvantage of customers in the clauses of the general terms and conditions and complained, informed Auer Witte Thiel.

The consultant’s liability by the highest German civil court judgments do not tear down: However, is what comes from Karlsruhe from investment advisor perspective not all bad. The consultant’s liability by the highest German civil court judgments do not tear down: However, is what comes from Karlsruhe from investment advisor perspective not all bad. Because with his latest ruling the Supreme Court has made it clear that a liability of the intermediary does not automatically occurs in any case constellation and investors can contact losses not aufhaltend hand directly to the Advisor. The judgment was based on essentially the following facts: the plaintiff had drawn a participation of a closed real estate fund in 1996. Commencement of the term, even distributions were obtained, which however could be maintained not due to economic difficulties in the aftermath. The plaintiff sought damages for a defective according to his investment advice with regard to the participation in the procedure.

With the completion of an also implied possible Consulting agreement between investors and advisors to a consulting according to the BGH object-oriented obligation for the latter. In this regard, risks and characteristics of the system with critical expertise must be checked. The filtered results are to inform the investors over. Such an analysis by the mediator will refrain from this can lead to an oft-cited consultant liability. To the relief of the intermediary this arrives only if a risk would become recognizable via the investor would need clarification on or but if would become evident, that a recommendation of the plant is not investor – or object-fair. When but a there are reasonable grounds for such a notice which was not clear so far. The latest judgment of Karlsruhe provides here, however, a little clarity. Specifically, it was about a so-called guarantee and then related costs, which was not sufficiently known according to the plaintiff’s (issued by a Bank for a debtor in case of failure to adhere).

Who pays the cost of kindergarten in the event of separation / divorce? The German Federal Supreme Court dealt in a case with the question, whether the post for a full-day kindergarten visit constitutes a greater need of the child and whether the bar breadwinner father for this to come up or the father would have to pay only the normal child support according to Dusseldorfer table. The working mother had requested that the father of the children involved in the cost of the kindergarten visit. The first competent District Court rejected the claim of the mother of the child, the Court of appeal also saw no claim of the mother of the child to pay additional maintenance in the amount of the costs incurred by the kindergarten visit. The Court of appeal has argued, the cost of the half-day visit of the kindergarten would be covered by the maintenance plus the attributable to him share of child support paid by the plaintiff. If in addition cost for full-time visiting of the facility, each if they were to work-related expenses of the mother, because the child visits as far as the kindergarten, so that the mother could pursue a full layered work. The Federal Supreme Court is opposed this argument. It considers that, are the costs incurred for the kindergarten visit to the needs of a child and represent basically no work-related expenses of the supervising parent. It was essential that the kindergarten visit serve educational purposes, whether part-time or full-time, first and foremost.

The expenses for this purpose were to count, which covers the cost of education to a child’s life needs. But the Supreme Court in its judgment of the 05.03.2008 (XII ZR 150/05) the kindergarten costs justified an overhead, i.e. beyond the ongoing maintenance need, but not to full extent. As far as incurred these costs for the half-day visit, they are generally included in the regularly paid child support. The BGH therefore alone in cost, recognized a need for more the the effort for the half-day kindergarten visit exceed. As far as entitled to additional payments for the benefit of the child was entitled to but both parents pro rata have by their income levels.

So the father of the child and mother of the child roughly the same, earning the overhead of two parents share is ever be to pay, so the father of the child then only to 50% liable. His income is higher than that of the mother of the child, the amount the child in addition to the maintenance can obtain after the Dusseldorf table increases percentage accordingly. Kindergarten costs are so included this discretion in the normal maintenance claim after Dusseldorf table, it can be ordered in addition something. Else applies only if it’s a full-day kindergarten. Then stick both parents for the extra costs.

When owes the workers compensation? Labour law in Germany is trying to bring about a fair balance between the interests of workers on the one hand and on the other hand, the employer. This attempt in the past despite constant complaints of both sides very well succeeded in basically, is to realize that the industrial peace, the basis for the economic development of in Germany is, can apply for several decades as secured. Of course does not labour law here to satisfy all interests. Every employer wants more freedom in decisions relating to its employees. And it would of course prefer, every worker if he could achieve a stage of Unkundbarkeit an official.

The truth is, as so often in the middle. Indeed labour law holds to but, a quite reasonable mechanisms for both sides to conflicts that may arise in the execution of an employment contract, solve. There is, for example, a copious case law on the question of what has to happen in breach of contract. “One can safely assume that the so-called Underachiever” with belongs to the questions for the employer side, most employ an employers. And it is clear that an employer is not immediately can separate by way of termination of his employee, if he is again not satisfied with the performance of its employees. Always a warning is possible in the case of contrary bad performance. With the help of a cease and desist letter to the workers clearly demonstrated that the employer is not willing, longer accept the breach of contract and continued bad behavior of the employees is also a termination in question run. A cease and desist letter is”a shot across the bow.

A warning for the workers concerned has financial consequences. Indeed, it is also denied an employer under the labour laws in Germany, a reduction of the salary due to the employee to carry out because of poor performance. The Law Institute of the reduction is known in German law but from other types of contracts such as the factory – and Sales Convention, belong to the service contract law labour law, a reduction of the compensation is not possible. However, a misconduct of an employee for this can have very well financial consequences. Because of course an employee has to be just his employer basically for damage he has caused this by his poor performance. Learn more at: Dr. Caldwell B. Esselstyn, Jr.. This follows alone from the right thought that even with a working relationship both parties are obliged to cause no damage to the other party. Indeed, the liability for damages of the worker in the German labour law however has limitations. Of workers liable employers generally only for intentionally or at least negligently damages his contract partner. And even in the event of gross negligence must be according to the Case-law of the Federal Labour Court an interests are made.

File sharing warning from Waldorf of Frommer a cease and desist letter for file sharing is already serious enough. This is even more tragic when Waldorf of Frommer’s letter comes. For at the Waldorf of Frommer’s lawyers can be spoken by real delusion with cease and desist letters. But what is in this case? A letter is in the post, this includes a cease and desist letter regarding sharing of Waldorf of Frommer. Here you accused, that you had downloaded something from the Internet criminally.

So the case is unanimously concluded, you have to pay up to thousands of euros for the download to a specific point in time. Otherwise the lawyers will initiate continue to take legal action against you, what is obviously still significantly more expensive. So you resist the best… It is possible that you have received a cease and desist letter, despite that you have done nothing. For this reason will talk about the so-called watchdog delusion. This is only possible in principle, when details were passed on by third parties.

You must oppose it but just against it. Gar nothing to do the right thing is in no way, if you have received a cease and desist letter for file sharing. It is nor conducive to a self-written letter in which they claim their innocence. On the contrary, can occur directly to a procedure, which is extremely expensive. You will need support from a specialist or a Rechtssachverstandigem. This should be responsible for the Internet right to advise you correctly with file sharing. Expenses for the advice to invest of course legal advice requires money. This can be between 100 and 350 euros, but these are expenses that are paying off for you. The lawyer will immediately contact for you lawyers Waldorf of Frommer. In the correspondence, everything is done to make the case for the world. After the first Exchange of letters claim continue to pay the lawyers of the opposition. You should hang in there but steady and follow the advice of the Advocate General. Because the watchdog delusion is very well known that also. On the advice of your legal counsel will receive also the tip to sign not the letter of the other side. Your legal expert will prepare a separate letter for you, that you need to sign. If you receive a warning from Waldorf of Frommer, you make an appointment directly with their legal counsel.